Definition

Set where is an ordered set has an infimum if

An ordered set is said to have the greatest lower bound property if and is bounded below, we have

which exists in .

Example

Recall that we saw does not have the least upper bound property. Indeed,

has no Supremum in .

Property (LUB = GLB)

Let be an ordered set. Then has the least upper bound property iff has the greatest lower bound property.

Proof:

Let . must be bounded below because the properties exist if at least one subset exists that satisfies it. We want to show exists.

           x      B ---->
<----------|------|---------> A

Let

  • since is bounded below.
  • is bounded above. Indeed, let and . Then since , is a lower bound for and so . In particular, and is bounded above.

Then has the least upper bound property, bounded above. Therefore exists. Let .

We claim that . To show this, we need to prove:

  1. is a lower bound
  2. is the greatest lower bound. I.e. .

Suppose is not a lower bound for . That is, suppose . Since and . This implies such that .

However, we have (by definition of the construction of ) which gives a contradiction

Now, for property , suppose . We want to show that such that . Suppose by contradiction it is not. Then, . Then is a lower bound for . On the other hand, . So, we can plug in to get a contradiction (conflicts with the supposition ).

TODO