Theorem (th Roots)
For every , and any there exists a unique such that .
Proof: (Uniqueness)
Recall if and , then . This can be proved with induction. Suppose such that
Either or . In either case, by our fact from above, .
Proof: (Existence)
We want to show that such that . Let
Note,
- is bounded above. Indeed, is an upper bound. Then, exists by the Completeness Axiom. Note . We claim .
Suppose for the sake of contradiction, that .
Case 1:
Our goal is to find some such that . If we can do this, then and , a contradiction.
We want to show, as this is equivalent to . Using fact we have:
Since , we can get a uniform bound on these terms.
- Indeed, the first term is .
- The second term is bounded by the same term.
- The second last term,
- The last term,
So, if
Choose to be half of the RHS. Then we are fine. However, the RHS may be larger than , so we can say
Case 2: Sketch: Find such that is still an upper bound for . Then which is contradiction with the Supremum. We want such that
This means is an upper bound for . This is the same as
We can use the identity from earlier to show an upper bound.
So, we can minimize this by maximizing . So, each term is smaller than . We get
We can let
Definition
Let and . Then, we denote as the unique such that .
Corollary
If real then .
Proof:
By definition, is the unique such that . Similarly, and is the unique and such that and .
So,
Then
and we are done.