Definition (Adjugate Matrix)

In linear algebra, the adjugate matrix (historically also called the classical adjoint) of a square matrix is the transpose of its cofactor matrix. It is an extremely important construction because it allows us to express the inverse of a matrix and the derivatives of determinants analytically without needing to perform division.

Before defining the adjugate, we must define the building blocks: minors and cofactors.

Definition (Minors and Cofactors)

For any square matrix :

1. Submatrices and Minors

If we delete row and column from , we obtain an submatrix, denoted as . The minor associated with the entry is defined as the determinant of this submatrix:

Since is the determinant of an matrix, it measures the “volume scaling” of the subspace map ignoring the -th input direction and -th output direction.

2. Cofactors

The cofactor associated with the entry is the minor signed by its position in the checkerboard pattern:

The sign factor alternates in a checkerboard grid:

The cofactor represents the rate of change of the determinant with respect to the entry , i.e., (see Jacobi’s Formula).

Definition (Adjugate Matrix Construction)

The adjugate matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix :

This means that the -entry of is the cofactor :

Theorem (Adjugate Entries are Determinants of Submatrix)

By definition, the cofactor is . The term is the determinant of the submatrix formed by deleting the -th row and -th column of .

Because the entry at row , column of the adjugate is exactly , every single element in is a signed determinant of one of these submatrices.

Example (2x2 Adjugate Matrix)

Let be a general matrix:

We compute the minors and cofactors for each entry:

  • For : Delete row 1, col 1 . Cofactor .
  • For : Delete row 1, col 2 . Cofactor .
  • For : Delete row 2, col 1 . Cofactor .
  • For : Delete row 2, col 2 . Cofactor .

The cofactor matrix is:

Taking the transpose of yields the adjugate matrix:

Observe how:

  1. Every entry is the determinant of a submatrix (a scalar).
  2. For invertible , , which perfectly matches the inverse formula!

Example (3x3 Adjugate Matrix)

Let be the matrix:

We compute the cofactors :

  • Row 1:
  • Row 2:
  • Row 3:

The cofactor matrix is:

Taking the transpose of yields the adjugate matrix:

We can verify the identity . Cofactor expansion along the first row of gives:

Computing the product:

This perfectly holds!

Theorem (The Adjugate Identity)

For any matrix , we have:

where denotes the identity matrix (the matrix with s on the main diagonal and s elsewhere).

Proof

Let . The -entry of is given by matrix multiplication:

We analyze two cases:

  1. If : This is exactly the cofactor expansion of along row . Thus, .
  2. If : This expression represents the cofactor expansion along row of a matrix obtained by replacing row of with row . Since has two identical rows (row and row ), its determinant is zero. Thus, for .

Therefore, . A completely symmetric argument for yields the same result.


Corollary (Matrix Inverse Formula)

If , then is invertible and:

Proof

Divide the adjugate identity (Theorem 1) by the scalar :

By uniqueness of the matrix inverse, the formula holds.


Theorem (Determinant of the Adjugate)

For any matrix :

Proof

Taking the determinant of both sides of the adjugate identity :

  • Case 1 (): We can divide both sides by to get:
  • Case 2 (): If , then . If were invertible, we could multiply by its inverse to get , which would imply (for ), a contradiction. Thus must be singular, so . Thus, holds (assuming ).

Theorem (Adjugate of a Product)

For any two matrices and :

Proof

  • If and are invertible:
  • General Case: Since invertible matrices are dense in the set of all matrices, the identity extends to all matrices by continuity.

Application (Invariant Derivatives in Continuum Mechanics)

In Stress-Strain Relation, we differentiate the characteristic polynomial with respect to the right Cauchy-Green deformation tensor .

Applying Jacobi’s Formula, we start with the matrix derivative:

Setting , the chain rule gives:

Using the inverse formula , we can rewrite the transpose-inverse term:

Substituting this back into the derivative:

The determinant terms cancel out completely. Since is a matrix polynomial in , we can equate powers of on both sides to compute the derivatives of individual invariants without needing to perform division by singular determinants.