Satellite Communication (SATCOM)
- True global connectivity
- Cellular is dependent on someone building a cell tower near the area you want to communicate on
- Remote areas are out of luck!
- Satellites are like moving cell towers
SATCOM Challenges
- Longer distances lead to path loss, and thus extra latency (LEO is 160-2000km from ground)
- Large deployment areas, means we share a lot of bandwidth. There are many handoffs.
- Deployment is expensive and coordination is difficult.
- Making a satellite is difficult!
- Radiation in space is a lot higher (no ozone to protect it).
- Need to use older technology
Orbits
Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
- 160-2000km
- Includes all current human spaceflight. ISS is at 400 km.
- Roughly 90 min for complete orbit
- Last about 5 years (fuel limitations)
Geostationary Orbit (GEO)
- 35768 km
- bandwidth is lower than LEO, also larger service area = more shared bandwidth
- Exactly 24 hours per complete orbit
- Result: fixed location in the sky over a portion on Earth
- very few satellites can cover all of earth
- operator can choose to only service a specific region
- Last about 20 years
Medium-Earth Orbit (MEO)
- roughly between LEO and GEO
- roughly 12 hours per complete orbit
- GNSS satellites are here (GPS, Galileo, etc.)
- smaller constellation, longer lifetime, signal is a little stronger
- radiation belts make this area more difficult to use
Path Loss and Latency to Orbit
- Distance contributes significantly to signal strength loss
- Need higher frequency. But higher frequency smaller antenna less energy connected weaker signal. This is part of the same signal-budget story discussed in Signal Qualities.
- Being at an angle on the horizon increases total distance and path loss.
- Speed of light gives
- LEO: ms
- MEO: ms
- GEO: ms
- Huge coverage areas share bandwidth among many users
- Cellular ideas can apply here by providing “cells of coverage” on the ground.
- Moving satellites lead to many handoffs. They move at around km/s.
Compared with Wide Area Networks, satellite systems push coverage much farther but pay for it with more latency, more shared bandwidth, and higher deployment complexity.
Cost Considerations
- Costs have dropped a lot in the last few years
- It is about $1000 per kg.
- Starlink v1.0: 260 kg, Starlink v2.0: 1250 kg, GPS: 1000-2000 kg